Exclusive: Investment platforms flouting tax rules on ISA stocks

Almost all UK investment platforms have been breaking HMRC rules by allowing stocks ineligible for tax relief to be put in ISAs, a City AM investigation has revealed.

AJ Bell, Fidelity, Interactive Investor and many others have been allowing stocks that should not get tax-free status to be added to ISA portfolios, meaning capital gains tax will not be paid on their returns.

HMRC rules dictate that shares can only be put in a stocks and shares ISA and receive tax relief if the common stock trades on one of the government’s recognised stock exchanges.

Examples of stock exchanges not recognised by HMRC include the Shanghai Stock Exchange, Saudi Stock Exchange, and Taiwan Stock Exchange, while the rule also excludes companies that do not have common stock traded on any exchange.

This is to make sure investors cannot invest in an illiquid stock that may be risky for ordinary investors to hold in their ISAs, though investors are still allowed to hold these outside of an ISA.

One example of this is Taiwanese chipmaker TSMC. The firm has a primary listing on the Taiwan Stock Exchange but has a secondary listing on the American Nasdaq.

However, since the stock is only listed on the Nasdaq through an American depositary receipt (ADR), not as common stock, it should not be allowed to be included in ISAs, and capital gains tax will have to be paid on any returns from its growth.

AJ Bell and Fidelity ISAs

A Bloomberg investigation recently found TSMC could be added to ISA on AJ Bell and Fidelity, but this option was quickly removed following the revelations.

However, City AM was still able to add Chinese company Legend Biotech to a Fidelity ISA, despite not having its ordinary shares traded on any exchange.

A Fidelity spokesperson said that as a result of this, it was looking into the matter and discussing it with HMRC, having removed the option to buy Legend Biotech from ISAs.

“We will continue to engage with HMRC and ensure that any impact for our customers is managed quickly, sensitively, and at no financial cost to the clients,” they added.

Meanwhile, AJ Bell allows French advertising company Criteo to be added to an ISA, which is also not eligible for the tax perk.

“This issue affected a small number of customers who will be given the option to either continue to hold the stock on the platform outside of an ISA if they wish, or they can sell the investment to correct their position at zero cost to them,” said an AJ Bell spokesperson.

Retail investors have been able to add ineligible stocks to their ISA platforms

However, the issue stretches well beyond just AJ Bell and Fidelity. On Interactive Brokers, City AM found that TSMC could be added to an ISA.

“Interactive Brokers has procedures in place to ensure that only qualifying investments are included in our ISA offering,” said a spokesperson for the company.

“To the extent ineligible securities, including certain Depository Receipts such as TSMC, might have inadvertently been permitted in clients’ accounts, Interactive Brokers will act in accordance with the ISA Regulations and Guidance so that clients are not unduly disadvantaged.”

‘My entire portfolio should not be in an ISA’

Investment platforms have repeatedly allowed these schemes to exist on their platforms, with little discernible action from the regulator.

The Financial Conduct Authority declined to comment.

One investor told City AM he had opened an ISA with fintech broker XTB, and was immediately able to buy TSMC, as well as a host of other stocks that should not qualify for tax relief.

When he contacted XTB to warn them he could add TSMC to his ISA, the stock was kicked out. However, the platform said there were no other issues with his portfolio despite a variety of other stocks he owned also being ineligible.

“They returned to say compliance were happy and there were no more errors. There categorically are. My entire portfolio of assets should not be in an ISA,” he said.

His XTB ISA still currently holds Qifu Technology, ABN AMRO Bank, Dada Nexus and Arm Holdings, all of which trade as depository receipts and are not primarily listed on a recognised exchange.

“How can a fintech like XTB get an HMRC ISA Manager licence and be in breach of regulations on day one?,” the investor added.

“Our customers have minimal exposure to these stocks,” an XTB spokesperson told City AM. “HMRC provides a clear remedy for this issue which we are actioning.”

‘Sheer complexity’ of ISA rules

AJ Bell, Fidelity, and XTB all removed access to TSMC when informed, but have failed to notice other ineligible stocks on their platforms, which suggests the firms do not have a comprehensive plan to catch disallowed stocks.

In fact, almost every investment platform examined by City AM saw similar problems emerge.

Dutch telecom firm Veon is able to be added to ISAs on both Trading 212 and Interactive Investor.

While the stock previously traded in the Euronext Amsterdam, a recognised stock exchange, it delisted in November and now trades only as an ADR on the Nasdaq.

An Interactive Investor spokesperson said the situation highlighted the “sheer complexity of the ISA eligibility rules,” and added that the customers who purchased the stock will have to sell it within the ISA wrapper or transfer it out to a trading account.

Trading 212 did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Halifax, Lloyds, Bank of Scotland, and Iweb all allow Chinese conglomerate Hello Group to be added to their ISAs, despite not being eligible.

Lloyds and the other platforms declined to comment.

The widespread regulatory transgressions raise questions over the compliance oversight of investment platforms, as well as the failure of the regulator to detect such issues.

The gaps in regulation could also harm retail investors if their previously tax-free assets are moved to a general investment account, leaving them exposed to capital gains tax.

Related posts

Meta fact-checking U-turn probed over Ronaldo Facebook deepfake scam

Missing WFH? I’ve found solace in the office booth

Tesco considers franchise of axed Post Office branches